PIAC’s submission analyses the current rules in relation to costs in litigation in NSW courts, noting that the usual rule is that costs follow the event, ie the losing party pays the winning party’s legal costs. PIAC recommends that consideration be given to reforming costs principles in order to facilitate access to justice. In particular, PIAC recommends that the costs rule should be reformed in public interest cases, with the introduction of legislation to create a presumption in favour of each party bearing their own legal costs in public interest proceedings. PIAC’s submission examines how to define public interest and the nature and timing of public interest costs orders. The submission also considers whether a general or public interest indemnity fund should be established as a method of removing costs barriers to public interest litigation.
Media Releases & Coverage
- 5 Dec 2023It's legal to deny insurance on mental health grounds, but Belle wants that changed
- 30 Nov 20232SER: Uncovering misuse of handcuffs in immigration detention
- 17 Nov 20232SER: Fighting the NDIS age cap at the UN
- 16 Nov 2023Asylum seeker settles handcuff case against Serco, govt
- 15 Nov 2023Commonwealth settles case with asylum seeker who missed medical appointments because of handcuff PTSD