PIAC recognises that the main reason for the rule change proposals is to ensure a high level of competition in the DER market. The proponents state and we agree that the way to do this is to prevent networks from adding DER such as batteries to their regulated asset bases. PIAC understands that service classification may not be the most appropriate mechanism through which to meet the objectives of the rule change proposals. Overall we suggest, in line with the Total Environment Centre’s submission, that there are potentially two ways to reduce the current complexity and to increase competition in line with the objectives of the proposed rule change. First, to change the way the AER classifies services, or, second, by requiring or allowing the AER to classify some assets as well as or instead of services.
Related Media Releases & Coverage
- 5 Aug 2021Increased energy bill support welcome news for NSW households under lockdown
- 22 Jun 2021Community and industry collaborate for better outcomes for people experiencing vulnerability
- 1 Jun 2021Treasury plans to give energy retailers control of consumer data should be abandoned
- 12 Feb 2021Overhaul needed for water planning
- 4 Feb 2021Energy rule-maker rejects rent-seeking bid, protects consumers