This submission responded to the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal’s (IPART) draft operating licence for Sydney Water Corporation (the draft licence). The submission addressed two issues: IPART’s efforts to achieve consistency between the licences of major public water utilities; and, the imposition of late fees. The submission stated that PIAC supports efforts to achieve consistency between operating licences for similar water utilities in NSW. However, the submission noted that consistency should not be pursued for its own sake, but only when such an approach will deliver good outcomes for consumers. In particular, PIAC argued that clauses in Sydney Water’s new licence should only be brought in line with clauses in Hunter Water’s current licence where the latter represents best regulatory practice. PIAC also stated that in principle, it does not support late fees. If such fees are imposed, they should only be charged at a level that recovers the costs imposed on the company by a customer failing to pay their bill on time.
Related Media Releases & Coverage
- 29 Sep 2023Australia’s transmission task needs a new approach – let’s open it up to competition
- 28 Aug 2023Eraring extension unnecessary: Government has cheaper, cleaner options
- 25 Aug 20232SER: Turning down the gas
- 18 Jul 2023“We can electrify the smart way, or the slow and expensive way”
- 15 Jun 2023Consumer groups welcome Knock to Stay Connected customer code for energy companies