This submission responded to the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal’s (IPART) draft operating licence for Sydney Water Corporation (the draft licence). The submission addressed two issues: IPART’s efforts to achieve consistency between the licences of major public water utilities; and, the imposition of late fees. The submission stated that PIAC supports efforts to achieve consistency between operating licences for similar water utilities in NSW. However, the submission noted that consistency should not be pursued for its own sake, but only when such an approach will deliver good outcomes for consumers. In particular, PIAC argued that clauses in Sydney Water’s new licence should only be brought in line with clauses in Hunter Water’s current licence where the latter represents best regulatory practice. PIAC also stated that in principle, it does not support late fees. If such fees are imposed, they should only be charged at a level that recovers the costs imposed on the company by a customer failing to pay their bill on time.
Related Media Releases & Coverage
- 9 Jan 2023‘Very legal loopholes’: Consumer groups seek tighter buy now, pay later curbs
- 22 Dec 2022Albanese plan has ‘dealt a blow’ to east coast gas supply
- 21 Dec 2022Consumers stuck with Snowy 2’s ballooning grid costs despite NSW energy deal
- 21 Dec 2022Anthony Albanese labels NSW energy deal ‘one of the biggest announcements’ he’ll make in office
- 21 Dec 2022Overhaul of energy concessions needed as three million households struggle to pay their energy bills