The removal of the common law right to silence through the operation of section 37 of the ICAC Act is balanced by the fact that answers given under objection cannot be used in civil, criminal or disciplinary proceedings. The right to object is balanced in turn by the fact that the ICAC can draw inferences, or bring contempt proceedings, over a refusal to answer. PIAC is not convinced that the proposed change is necessary and is concerned at the potential for long-standing rights and protections – like the right to silence and the privilege against self-incrimination’ to leach out of the general law under the influence of statutes of more specific application, such as the ICAC Act.
Media Releases & Coverage
- 7 Dec 2021Civil society organisations call for a Christmas pause on COVID fine collection to reduce hardship in communities already doing it tough
- 3 Dec 2021New report: Two years after Medevac, asylum seekers still waiting in hotels for urgent medical treatment
- 24 Nov 2021Parliament must reject ‘worse than feared’ Religious Discrimination Bill
- 21 Nov 2021Opinion: Australia must raise the age of responsibility to 14 or keep trapping children in a quicksand of criminality
- 17 Nov 2021Opinion: Religious Discrimination Bill still discriminates against many, despite removal of Folau clause